Restart Fintech works as an implementation partner under a fractional CTO model. Its specialists take responsibility for technical planning, product roadmaps, vendor decisions, and delivery while the client retains control of the business and investment product.

Restart Fintech builds tailored infrastructure rather than licensing a standard tokenization platform. A project can include smart contracts, investor onboarding, wallet integration, custody connections, and links to existing business systems. Buyers seeking a self-serve product and established distribution should consider Securitize instead.

The custom model fits regulated institutions with non-standard asset structures or jurisdiction-specific requirements. Restart Fintech can build infrastructure for tokenized real estate and private credit. It can also support money market fund projects that require tailored issuance, settlement, compliance, or custody connections.

● Fractional CTO delivery gives institutions senior technical ownership without requiring a full internal blockchain department.● Custom development can accommodate existing systems, unusual fund structures, and specific custody arrangements.● Regulatory planning can address KYC and AML controls alongside relevant MiCA, Swiss DLT Act, or SEC considerations.● Restart Fintech can support an institution through product planning, implementation, and technical handover.

● Restart Fintech offers no self-serve tier for issuers that want to configure and launch a standard product independently.● Custom delivery usually requires more discovery and implementation work than adopting an established SaaS platform.● Restart Fintech does not offer the built-in distribution network associated with a platform such as Securitize.

Restart Fintech uses flexible engagement pricing based on project scope and delivery needs. Some engagements may include equity-based structures that connect compensation to the project’s longer-term progress. Buyers must request a proposal because Restart Fintech publishes no standard self-serve plans.

Securitize uses a platform model for issuing and managing tokenized securities. Its coverage includes investment funds, private credit, and equity, with real estate available through security and fund structures. These asset classes represent active areas for institutional tokenization, including tokenized money market funds and Treasury products, according to PwC.
The platform model provides predefined issuance and asset-servicing workflows. By contrast, an implementation partner builds workflows around an issuer’s specific asset structure, jurisdictions, and internal systems.

Securitize offers broad asset coverage and suits issuers that prioritize an established platform and distribution over bespoke engineering. Its securities focus also matches assets that require enforceable ownership rights and transfer controls.

Issuers with unusual governance, settlement, or cross-border requirements may find a standard platform less flexible than a custom build. The supplied research does not verify specific registrations, licenses, onboarding terms, or jurisdictional coverage, so buyers should confirm those details directly.

Securitize does not disclose verifiable pricing in the supplied research. Buyers should request vendor pricing based on issuance structure, investor servicing, and regulatory requirements.

Tokeny provides tokenization infrastructure that links investor eligibility to digital assets and enforces transfer rules on-chain. Asset managers often evaluate Tokeny in institutional tokenization comparisons, which reflects its established position in the SaaS category.

● Identity controls help issuers restrict ownership and transfers to approved investors.● The SaaS model can shorten delivery compared with commissioning custom infrastructure.● Compliance features support regulated issuance and secondary transfers.

● Issuers with unusual asset structures or jurisdiction-specific requirements may need custom development beyond the standard platform.● Buyers seeking an implementation partner with fractional CTO support should consider Restart Fintech instead.● Buyers should verify support for real estate, private credit, or money market funds against their exact issuance structure.

Tokeny does not provide pricing details in the available research. Issuers should request a quote based on issuance volume, required modules, and compliance scope.

Centrifuge provides tokenization infrastructure with a clear private credit specialization. Its integration with Sky, formerly MakerDAO, connects tokenized credit pools with onchain financing. Securitize and Tokeny support broader issuance use cases, while Centrifuge focuses more narrowly on structured credit. Public research does not establish comparable strength in real estate or money market funds

● Centrifuge gives credit originators a route to DeFi-integrated liquidity.● Its structure supports loan pools and trade finance assets that may require tranching or special-purpose vehicles.● Independent research categorizes Centrifuge as a tokenization platform.

● Secondary liquidity for tokenized private credit often remains thin.● Public research does not document specific regulatory licenses or broad asset-class coverage.● Credit pools may impose lockups that limit investor flexibility.

Centrifuge does not publicly disclose pricing in the available research. Originators should request fees for issuance, servicing, and protocol integration directly.

Ondo Finance issues OUSG and USDY, which provide on-chain exposure to short-term U.S. Treasuries and bank deposits. Ondo Nexus lets eligible holders redeem third-party tokenized money market funds through OUSG. Its partners include Franklin Templeton, WisdomTree, and Wellington Management. Ondo operates primarily as a tokenized fund issuer and liquidity network, although Ondo Chain and Ondo Bridge also provide infrastructure for integrations.

OUSG supports round-the-clock subscriptions and redemptions, while USDY serves eligible non-U.S. investors. Ondo provides compliance checks and multichain access.

Ondo does not focus on real estate or private credit. Institutions seeking white-label issuance, custom workflows, or hands-on implementation should choose another vendor category. Product access also depends on investor status and jurisdiction.

Ondo does not publish standard institutional integration pricing. Product fees and eligibility requirements vary, so prospective clients must request current terms.